On June 11, 2018, the General Office of the Party Committee and the General Office of the Government of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region officially issued the Opinions on Implementing the Unified Judicial Appraisal Management System of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, and put forward the measures for implementing the Opinions on Implementing the Unified Judicial Appraisal Management System of the State Office of the People's Republic of China.

In October 2017, the State Office of the Central Government issued Opinions on Implementing a Sound and Unified Judicial Appraisal Management System. The Party Committee of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region and the main leaders of the government gave instructions. The judicial department of the autonomous region, in consultation with other relevant units, took the lead in drafting documents for examination and submission, which were deepened by the Party Committee of the autonomous region in the field of democracy and the legal system and the society of the After deliberation at the 4th plenary meeting of the special group on the reform of the system and approval by the people's government of the autonomous region, it was considered at the 9th meeting of the Leading Group of the Eleventh Autonomous Region Party Committee on the Comprehensive Deepening of Reform on April 17, 2018. The content of Guangxi Opinions on Implementation is divided into five parts and 20 articles. It has been revised and perfected many times according to 82 opinions and suggestions put forward by relevant departments, trade associations, grass-roots units and conferences.

The implementation opinions of Guangxi carry out the spirit of the central documents and put forward the specific requirements of unified judicial expertise management system, focusing on four aspects. First, unified management requirements. We will further refine and unify access conditions for judicial expertise in autonomous regions, unify registration management and announcements, unify professional rules, unify expertise standards, and unify regulatory measures, so as to promote the healthy development of the judicial expertise industry in autonomous regions. The two is to define the division of responsibilities. To clarify the responsibilities and division of labor of the relevant units, promote the connection between the management and use of judicial expertise, establish and improve the operational mechanism of Judicial Expertise Management under the leadership of the Party Committee, the supervision of the People's Congress, the implementation of the government and the active cooperation of the relevant units; and emphasize objectivity and impartiality. Unify the practice rules and standards of forensic expertise; improve the accountability system of forensic expertise, stipulate the lifelong accountability system of forensic expertise, formulate the methods of investigating the responsibility of forensic expertise for violations of laws and regulations, establish the system of recording, reporting and investigating the responsibility of interfering in the activities of forensic expertise; implement the system of appearing in court of forensic expertise; Exit mechanism. The four is to give prominence to development guarantee. We should improve the working mechanism of coordination and coordination among various units, strengthen government support, integrate resources and build high-quality appraisal institutions and laboratories, with emphasis on strengthening science and technology and team building.

In recent years, Guangxi has promulgated local laws and regulations on judicial expertise, issued opinions on the connection between management and use of judicial expertise, revised the management methods of fees for judicial expertise, formulated measures for handling and punishing complaints in the judicial expertise industry, actively strengthened the construction of judicial expertise team, strengthened institutional management, and seriously investigated and punished the judiciary. Appraise illegal activities and constantly improve the quality and credibility of judicial expertise. In 2017, 727 forensic experts from 66 accreditation institutions in the region completed 50592 appraisal cases.

Source: Ministry of justice, government network